n

n
PUTRAJAYA, Oct 21 — Datuk Seri Najib Razak today said in his 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) trial that he is not asking for immunity as a former prime minister, but wants to be treated equally in this trial.
Today is the first day of the final submissions by both the defence and prosecution before the High Court decides if Najib is guilty or not in this case, where he is facing 25 charges involving over RM2 billion of 1MDB’s funds.
Before his lawyers began presenting arguments in court, Najib spent 16 minutes reading out his prepared statement — which his lead lawyer Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah described as a “foreword” — to the judge.
Najib insisted that the huge sums of money which entered his personal bank accounts were donations from Saudi Arabia to him.
“It will also be discovered from this submission that my belief about the Saudi donation is not just some made-up fantasy,” Najib said, among other things.
Najib claimed that the US$681 million which entered his bank accounts was allegedly not proved to be traceable to 1MDB, and asserted he had returned US$620 million of this sum to the bank account where it came from, since it had not been used up.
“Before returning the unused donation, I wrote to the Governor of Bank Negara, Tan Sri Zeti, seeking Bank Negara’s approval for the return.
“I would probably be the only alleged ‘corrupt politician/money-launderer’ who returns the so-called gratification that he worked so hard to obtain, and probably the first in recorded history to have announced his ‘ill-gotten’ money to the Governor of Bank Negara of all people,” Najib said, referring to former BNM governor Tan Sri Zeti Akhtar Aziz.
Earlier in his statement, Najib also said the way he had acted was consistent with his belief that the money he had received were from a donation promised by Saudi Arabia’s then ruler King Abdullah.
For example, he said he did not have any offshore accounts and instead opened a bank account under his own name at a local bank in Malaysia, and that even Bank Negara’s governor was immediately informed that the account’s purpose was to receive donations from Saudi Arabia.
He also said the donations were used for political and social welfare purposes that were all paid using cheques “with every sen recorded and accounted for”.
“No million dollar painting or swanky property was purchased from the funds I received,” he said.
Najib claimed that there was political interference in the investigation and the process under which he was charged in the 1MDB trial, citing former inspector-general of police Tan Sri Mohamad Fuzi Harun’s previous testimony as the 19th defence witness in this case.
Najib said that all Malaysians have a right to fair investigation and fair prosecution.
“As a former prime minister, I am not asking for immunity, far from it; I am only seeking equality—the right to be treated like any other individual who has come before the judicial system,” Najib said.
In his statement, Najib also challenged the credibility of multiple prosecution witnesses who had testified against him in the 1MDB trial, saying they were not charged for their alleged misconduct as public officials.
He pointed out that only he had been charged, and suggested that others had not been charged so they could testify as witnesses against him.
Najib also claimed that the prosecution had relied on hearsay evidence against him, and said the prosecution had allegedly not shown their attempts to locate witnesses such as Low Taek Jho.
Najib said some of the actions he was charged for involve his fulfilling of his official duties under then prime minister Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi’s and the latter’s Cabinet’s instructions, and approvals which he was legally required to give under the Companies Act.
n
n
n
n

n
n
Lawyer Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah said his client Datuk Seri Najib Razak needed to read out his statement and cited two past court cases where the accused was also allowed to read out their statements in court. — Picture by Raymond Manuel
n
n
Earlier, Shafee said Najib needed to read out his statement and cited two past court cases where the accused was also allowed to read out their statements in court.
The prosecution’s Datuk Ahmad Akram Gharib noted that the lawyer for an accused person would usually the one to read such statements based on the law, but said the prosecution had no serious objections to Najib doing so.
Najib was then allowed to read out his written statement, and this was followed by his lawyer Wan Azwan Aiman Wan Fakhruddin presenting the final arguments to defend him.
Shafee told the High Court that the defence team had prepared seven volumes of written submissions for the 1MDB hearing.
Najib’s 1MDB trial is scheduled to be heard for these three weeks, namely every weekday from today until November 7.
n
n
n
n

n
n
n
n
n