A New Political Future for MCA, MIC, and Gerakan: Dissolution, Rebirth, and the Dangers of Any Alignment with PAS

As Malaysia approaches GE16, the political environment is evolving rapidly. Barisan Nasional (BN), once a giant in Malaysian politics, has been reduced to a secondary role. For MCA and MIC, staying inside BN offers no meaningful future. However, simply joining Gerakan is also unrealistic, as Gerakan is now smaller and lacks national influence.

A bold, structural reset is required:
MCA, MIC, and Gerakan should dissolve and re-form as a new multi-ethnic party—possibly strengthened by reformist leaders sidelined within PKR, such as Rafizi Ramli’s faction.

But before exploring that path, one fundamental warning must be clearly stated.

1. Collaborating with PAS Would Be Politically Destructive

For MCA, MIC, and even a future multi-ethnic coalition, cooperation with PAS would be a catastrophic strategic move.

Why?

(1) PAS’s ideological direction directly contradicts the priorities of non-Muslim voters

PAS’s conservative Islamic agenda conflicts with the expectations of:

  • Chinese voters

  • Indian voters

  • Sabah/Sarawak multi-faith communities

  • Urban middle-class professionals

  • Moderate Malays who prefer inclusive politics

Any partnership with PAS would instantly alienate these groups.

(2) MCA and MIC’s remaining supporters would abandon them

These two parties already face eroding support.
If they align with PAS, whatever support remains will evaporate entirely.

(3) A new multi-ethnic party cannot be credible if it collaborates with a religious hardline party

A party that claims to represent all races and religions cannot simultaneously align with PAS’s exclusive religious-political framework.
This contradiction would destroy the new party’s legitimacy before it even begins.

(4) PAS’s political strategy is Malay-centric and incompatible with multi-ethnic ideals

PAS prioritizes:

  • Islamic law

  • Malay-Muslim political dominance

  • A cultural agenda that excludes non-Muslim aspirations

Cooperation would force the new party into a submissive, irrelevant role—just like what has happened to PAS’s non-Muslim allies in the past.

In short: any collaboration with PAS is political suicide.

2. Staying in BN Is Also a Dead End

If BN continues cooperating with Pakatan Harapan for GE16, MCA and MIC will receive only a small number of seats and continue sliding toward irrelevance. They will never regain influence.

BN offers stability for UMNO—not survival for MCA or MIC.

3. Merely Joining Gerakan Is Unrealistic

Gerakan today is weaker than MCA and MIC. Absorbing into a smaller party does not create strength; it only consolidates weakness.

A simple merger under Gerakan’s name will not change voter perceptions or create national traction.

4. The Only Viable Path: Dissolve All Three Parties and Form a New Multi-Ethnic Political Force

A radical reset gives them their only real chance to survive and grow.

This new party would carry:

  • no racial labels

  • no old baggage

  • a fresh identity appealing to modern voters

By pooling organisational structures, grassroots networks, and remaining supporters, the three parties can form a meaningful political entity instead of fading away separately.

5. Strengthen the New Party by Bringing in Rafizi Ramli’s Reformist Faction

To attract Malay support and national credibility, the new party must recruit reform-minded leaders with real influence.

Rafizi Ramli and his sidelined faction within PKR are ideal because:

  • they appeal to urban, professional, young Malay voters

  • they promote policy-driven, technocratic politics

  • they are currently marginalized in PKR and may seek a new political platform

Combining Chinese, Indian, and multi-ethnic grassroots networks with a Malay reformist faction creates a coalition with genuine national reach.

6. This Could Become the Multi-Ethnic Alternative Malaysia Has Long Needed

Malaysia has never had a truly multi-ethnic, modern, technocratic political party free from old racial baggage.

A new party of this nature would:

  • appeal to young voters

  • attract moderates across all races

  • provide an alternative to both PH and PN

  • break the old race-based political molds

This opportunity will not remain forever.

Conclusion

Cooperating with PAS is politically fatal.
Remaining in BN is a slow death.
Joining Gerakan alone is impractical.

The only path with real potential is this:
Dissolve MCA, MIC, and Gerakan, rebuild from zero as a new multi-ethnic political movement, and energize it by integrating reformist Malay leaders such as Rafizi’s faction.

If they dare to take this radical step, these parties may not only save themselves, but also reshape Malaysia’s political future.

马华、国大党与民政的政治新未来：解散重组、多元新党，以及绝不能与回教党合作的必要性

随着马来西亚迈向第十六届全国大选（GE16），政治环境正迅速变化。曾经在我国政治中独霸一方的国阵，如今已沦为次要力量。对马华与国大党而言，继续留在国阵已不再带来未来。至于加入民政党也并不现实，因为民政如今比马华和国大党更弱、更缺乏号召力。

因此，一个更大胆、更具战略意义的方案逐渐浮现：
马华、国大党与民政三党同时解散，重组为一个全新的多元种族政党——并吸纳如拉菲兹（Rafizi Ramli）这类在公正党内部被边缘化的改革派领袖，共同打造真正具全国号召力的新政治力量。

但在讨论重建之前，有一个关键警告必须被强调。

一、与回教党（PAS）合作将是自毁前程

对马华、国大党，甚至未来可能出现的新多元政党来说，和回教党合作将是极其危险且破坏性的决定。

为什么不能与PAS合作？

（1）PAS的意识形态与非穆斯林选民完全冲突

PAS的宗教保守路线，根本无法让以下族群接受：

  • 华人选民

  • 印裔选民

  • 沙巴与砂拉越多元宗教社群

  • 城市中产与专业人士

  • 倾向包容政治的温和马来人

与PAS合作会立即断绝这些票源。

（2）马华与国大党仅存的支持者会彻底流失

这两党的支持本就大幅萎缩，一旦与PAS靠拢，剩余的非穆斯林选民必然离开。

（3）一个宣称要多元的政党，绝不可能同时与宗教保守党合作

新多元党若与PAS合作，其“多元、包容”的形象会当场破产，根本无法建立全国信任。

（4）PAS的政治路线以马来穆斯林至上为核心，与多元理念完全不相容

PAS优先推动：

  • 伊斯兰法

  • 马来穆斯林主导政治

  • 排他性的宗教文化政策

任何合作只会让新政党沦为附庸，无法发展自身路线。

结论很清楚：与PAS合作是政治自杀。

二、继续留在国阵，也是一条死路

如果国阵继续与希盟合作打GE16，马华与国大党可获得的议席只会越来越少，影响力也持续萎缩。

国阵的稳定是为巫统服务的，不是为了让马华或国大党复兴。

三、加入民政并不现实

民政如今比马华和国大党更弱、更缺乏资源与基层力量。
若三党只是简单地“加入民政”，只是弱者并弱者相加，不会产生任何政治力量。

这无法打造新的全国政党，也无法改变选民的观感。

四、唯一可行的路线：三党同时解散，成立一个全新的多元政党

一个彻底的结构重置，才可能让他们重新争取政治生存与发展空间。

三党解散并重组为全新政党，可以带来以下优势：

  • 没有旧的包袱与种族标签，更容易吸引现代选民

  • 避免“旧品牌疲劳”，创造真正的新形象

  • 整合三党的资源、基层与组织网络，形成真正的政治量级

这比任何“加入谁”、“支持谁”的方式都更具结构性与未来性。

五、吸纳拉菲兹派系，形成真正的跨族群改革力量

若要获得马来选民的认同，并展现真正的全国性政党格局，新党必须吸纳具声望、具改革理念的马来领袖。

拉菲兹及其在公正党内被边缘化的改革派，是极具潜力的合作对象，因为他们：

  • 深受城市马来中产与青年支持

  • 推崇政策导向、技术官僚式政治

  • 代表改革、效率、反腐败的价值观

  • 在公正党内部受到压制，正寻找新平台

若新政党能够吸引这批改革派加入，将立即拥有跨族群、跨阶层的政治吸引力。

这是一股“华巫印+改革派+技术官僚”的新政治组合，是马来西亚政治从未真正出现过的力量。

六、这可能成为马来西亚真正需要的多元政治替代力量

马来西亚一直缺乏一个真正意义上的、现代的、多元种族、政策导向的新政党。
三党若能整合，并吸收改革派领袖，将有机会：

  • 吸引年轻选民

  • 吸引专业人士与中产阶级

  • 吸引希望摆脱种族政治的族群

  • 成为区别于希盟与国盟的第三选择

  • 重塑马来西亚的政治版图

这机会不会永远存在。

结论

与回教党合作是政治自杀；
继续留在国阵是缓慢走向死亡；
加入民政也无助于生存。

唯一具有真正潜力的道路是：
马华、国大党与民政三党同时解散，重新建立一个全新的多元政党，并吸纳如拉菲兹派系这样的改革派领袖，让新政党具备真正的全国号召力。

若他们敢于采取如此大胆且前所未有的步骤，不仅能拯救自身，更可能重塑马来西亚的政治未来。

Related articles:

1. Unity Government vs Opposition: Who Will Win GE16?
2. But Malaysia Could Become More Conservative If Moderates Stay Silent
3. Is Malaysia Becoming More Conservative — Or Just Louder?
4.Malaysia’s Racial Politics: Are We Stuck Forever, or Slowly Moving Forward?
5. Malaysia Politics Today: A Country That Wants Stability, but Keeps Getting Drama
6. The Legacy of Mahathir’s Policies: The Cost of National Unity
7. The Dangers of PAS’s Religious Political Agenda: Malaysia at a Crossroads
8. The Grave Dangers of Merging Politics and Religion: A Fatal Threat to Pluralistic Societies
9. Those who always use race and religion issues to seek political gains are morally corrupt leaders